Why do they think electric cars are any more emissions friendly?
Damn good question, as most know making those batteries is a nasty proposition. I thought I heard from a few credible sources that the average fossil fuel car vrs electric would take in the neighborhood of 80k Miles to break even with the nasties of manufacturing electric cars, and the electric carbon foot print of power generation to get the KW to the wheels and go down the road. Somehow people seem to think little elf’s in a hollow tree do more than bake cookies. Not very carbon neutral, LOL if ya ask me.
Also where is that electric coming from. What electric plant, nuke, coal, oil, nat gas? Agreed it is much more controllable at a single control source point vrs thousands of tail pipes. But one has to manufacture a lot more cable, transformers, telco poles, metal towers for high tension wires power distribution, electric sub stations. All this to revamp and get a shit ton of Megs out there for the cars. Then only to drive X miles to break even. All this to be further compounded by the fact that a lot of the nasty batteries will need to be pulled out out and replaced to breath new life into the electric vehicle at some point, or just recycle it and produce another electric widget car. The largest single thing I am bewildered about is the sourced energy that is overlooked it is either being burned at a power plant or internal combustion engine, both are generating emission. It brings you back to very large power plant stacks vrs many tail pipes, where as the fossil fuel infrastructure is already embedded and set up. Where’s the break even overall energy to emission break even point?
If someone has this answer with a proven theory please share some info. I would love to buy a tropical island and maybe have a cocktail drink with my Avitar name on it. .02